Jose Iglesias can't hit. Not even a little bit.
Much is currently being made about Iglesias and his struggles in Boston since being called up a few weeks ago, and with his batting average currently sititng at .067 (2-for-30), it's understandable. Furthering the discussion are moves like the one Red Sox manager Bobby Valentine made on Sunday, in which he pinch-hit for Iglesias in the middle of an at-bat (with a 2-2 count, nonetheless) because a runner had advanced into scoring position during the at-bat. Scott Lauber of the Boston Herald has more on Valentine's reaction to questions about the move after the game, in which Valentine continued his crazy-person act by pretending like this is something that happens all the time.
Not that the move was wrong. Again, Iglesias can't hit. Which is problematic for any player labeled as the <fill in the blank> of the future for any team, but even worse when the blank is shortstop and the team is the Red Sox.
The common stance on the Iglesias matter is that his future is tied to his bat, which Jeff Louderback of BoSoxBanter.com points out in a recent article, but I'll argue that that is an optimistic statement in and of itself.
That was the statement when Iglesias signed out of Cuba with a reputation as a defensive wizard but questions surrounding his bat. It's also a living testament to the need for scouts, who nailed the book in Iglesias.
But that can't still be the question unless you think Iglesias will turn things around with the bat, which is a hope dripping with naive optimism.
It's not just that Iglesias has been disappointing with the bat. He's been horrible. His best season offensive season was his first in which he hit an empty .285 as a 20-year-old in Double-A Portland with no power, no on-base ability and a .672 OPS. It's been much of the same since then, with a .589 OPS in 189 career games in Triple-A over the past two years.
Which is why his at-bats this fall just aren't as important as they are being made out to be. Is Iglesias a .067 hitter at the major league level? No, but he's not going to be too far above .200. But more important is his plate discipline. Batting averages fluctuate, and with regular at-bats over the next ten years, Iglesias will probably turn in seasons in which he hits everywhere from .215 to .275 while being the same exact hitter the entire time. But what could make him passable at the plate is the ability to just not be an automatic out, which he demonstrated improvement in this season in Triple-A.
Repeating the level, Iglesias raised his walk rate slightly (to just 6.8% which is still too low) and lowered his strike out rate to 11.6%. If he can continue improvement in that regard, he's got a shot to at least be a regular.
But what the Red Sox really need to do is make a decision on Iglesias based solely on what they know now, because realistically, there's not much improvement left to be made with his offensive game. Luckily for both Iglesias and the Red Sox, Iglesias is one of the few players in the game who can make a justifiable argument for playing time despite not being able to hit.
Iglesias' abilities at shortstop are so stellar, and he's doing it at one of two positions where defensive ability can possibly outweigh offensive inability (the other being catcher), that he may be worthy of regular playing time despite his offensive limitations. If nothing else, he's worth a shot for one year to see just how good he can make a team with just his glove.
The question for the Red Sox is whether or not they can be that team. If you're going to feature a lineup with a virtually automatic out in it in order to play a defense-only player, he must be surrounded by above-average offensive players in a number of other places. The Mets made deep playoff runs in 1999-2000 with Rey Ordonez* getting significant playing time at shortstop because they surrounded him with Mike Piazza, Robin Ventura, Edgardo Alfonzo, John Olerud and others. The Red Sox may not have that kind of lineup around Iglesias next season, in which case, he may not be the best fit for their immediate plans. Those are the questions that remain for this off-season.
*Ironically, Ordonez is the player Iglesias is most often compared to, and with good reason given their similar skill-set and Cuban heritage. Unfortunately for Red Sox fans, Ordonez's minor league numbers are significantly better than Iglesias', and we know what kind of hitter he turned out to be.
The bottom line for the Red Sox and Iglesias this off-season does not come down to what he does in twenty more at-bats this fall, but what type of team they end up building for next season. If they add a bat or two and feel like they can afford to have Iglesias in their lineup, then that's exactly what they should do. If they feel they want to build around pitching and defense, then they'd be hard pressed to find a better shortstop to help out their pitching staff. But if they feel they need more bats, then Iglesias can't be an option, unless that option is to trade him for a shortstop that can hit.